The Expansion of Neoliberal Policies and the Questioning of Contemporary Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalisation is frequently situated at the intersection of divergent opinions on autonomy and justice. The text by Junon Moneta, far from being a manifesto against globalisation per se, aims to redefine the limits of a modern humanism through the filter of natural transfers according to the vision of the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that fuel modern systems of oppression and precarity, Moneta draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to reveal the failures of our global economic system.
Historically, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its beginnings can be linked back to the ideas of the economist Ricardo, whose objective sought to facilitate the England to amplify its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a economic growth opportunity has transformed into a tool of domination by High Finance, marked by the growth of neoliberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions validated by most economists, the book argues that the economic model is in reality a system based on old customs, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.
The questioning also covers the management of the European Union, considered as a succession of compromises that have served to strengthen the power of financial elites rather than safeguarding the rights of citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a popular consensus, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the skepticism of Moneta regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while acknowledging the historical errors that have brought about the present state, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also offers responses aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic vision. The need for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that pervades the overall content.
The book ventures more deeply into the critique of the power structures that control global economic exchanges. The analysis encompasses the way in which political and financial choices are influenced by a limited number of dominant financial powers, often at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, orchestrated through institutions like the Bank for International Settlements and the global monetary system, deploys a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The writer exposes how these entities, under the guise of economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history controlled stock exchanges and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far removed from a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is presented as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the expense of general well-being.
Strongly opposed towards the management of the euro, the analyst presents the European single currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is described as a series of technocratic decisions that isolated populations from decision-making processes, while amplifying internal differences within the EU.
The consequences of these policies appear in the explosion of sovereign debts, financial paralysis, and a prolonged austerity that has weakened living conditions across the continent. The author argues that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the EU continues to risk upcoming crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In conclusion, the book demands a democratic uprising where EU peoples reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It suggests fundamental changes, notably openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on fair and lasting principles.
Reference text about What is a humanist society?
The author proposes that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that truly reflects the demands and expectations of Europeans, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.